Judy Moffett ([info]hefngafr) wrote,
@ 2008-08-13 14:44:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood:exercised
Entry tags:book industry, dan brown, greg frost, lord tophet, marcel proust, shadowbridge

Lord Tophet as a box of pricey cornflakes
This is a squeal of indignation, uttered on behalf of my friend Greg Frost, whose newest rave review about his newest novel we've recently been offered a chance to read at http://calico-reaction.livejournal.com/tag/gregory+frost.

Greg hasn't noised abroad (but I hereby noise it for him) the news that Borders has decided not to order Lord Tophet for their stores. That's ANY of the stores in the Borders chain. Their "explanation" being that Shadowbridge didn't sell as well as they thought it needed to, in order to justify making the sequel available to shoppers. It didn't say how many copies of Shadowbridge they bought, or how many of those went out the door how quickly. Thus does one discover the meaning of "self-fulfilling prophecy," also that a book in a big chain bookstore is like a box of cornflakes in a supermarket: what gets restocked is what sells best. Not pretty damn decently, but best.

I can't tell you how many supermarket products, that I used to like and buy, have disappeared from the shelves because not enough other people liked them as well as similar, probably cheaper, and (in my view, inferior) products. The policy now is not to offer a broad range of products and give customers a wide choice, but to offer a narrow range of only the best-selling products. Nothing matters but how fast they fly off the shelves, i.e. the bottom line. When the product is not cornflakes but art, the implications are very, very scary; and the principle applies not just at the level of bookstores but all the way back up to publishers and the editors who work for them, and behind both of those to the stockholders of their respective corporations.

It would be wonderful to get both rave reviews and brisk sales, both award nominations and print run after print run, and a few happy/lucky writers do possess that double gift; but most fall nearer one end or the other of a range defined by, say, Dan Brown on one end and Marcel Proust on the other. But we hold these truths to be self-evident, don't we, that best-selling writers are not the only ones worth reading--when they are worth reading at all--and that phenomenal success in the marketplace is no measure of artistic merit.

I realize I'm preaching to the choir here, but I'm frustrated and pissed about this, and also deeply worried. What happens to art when the business of the bookselling and -publishing industries is all but entirely business?

If we needed another reason to support the independent bookstores and shun the chains, here it is. Go buy Lord Tophet from a store where the owners love books, in addition to caring--as they must too, of course--about the bottom line.




(8 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]mastadge
2008-08-15 12:58 pm UTC (link)
I was extraordinarily annoyed. My local Borders at least tends to stock books early. They didn't stock this one -- one of my most anticipated of the year -- at all.

When you order an in-print book from Borders and then don't pick it up, do they automatically return it or stick it on the shelves in the hope that it'll sell?

But yes, people keep asking whether they should buy books online. My stock answer is generally along the lines of, "No. Units sold is units sold, but stores, particularly the chains, base their decision about whether to stock a new book largely on how many copies the previous book by that author has sold through that store. If you buy online, you make it less likely that the stores will stock copies, making it less likely that new readers will stumble on your favorite author's new book, thereby eliminating potential readers and making it less likely that your author will continue to get published." People think I make too big a deal of it, but I absolutely try to get any book I want by a (living) author I like through a physical store, even if I have to pay a little more or wait a little longer.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]mastadge
2008-08-15 12:59 pm UTC (link)
Oh, moving past online versus physical into chains vs independent -- unfortunately, in my immediate area, the chains have years since driven most independent stores out and the one that's left probably won't last too much longer.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hefngafr
2008-08-15 01:10 pm UTC (link)
In Lexington (KY) we're extraordinarily lucky, and we know it, to have Joseph-Beth, an independent bookstore (with locations in Louisville and Cincinnati as well, so a tiny minichain) that's indistinguishable from a Borders or a Barnes & Noble in terms of size and ambiance. But that's not true in Swarthmore PA, where I live for half the year.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]realthog
2008-08-15 01:45 pm UTC (link)

Greg's not the only one. Some of my nonfiction books are published by a UK house that distributes over here through the US publisher Sterling. Since Sterling is owned by Barnes & Noble, Borders won't stock any of its books -- including those books it distributes. In a way one can understand this -- why give succour to the enemy? -- but in a way one most emphatically can't: the logic falls down as soon as you look at it a bit more closely. Whatever the case, it means these books of mine are boycotted by Borders because of an argument in which I (not to mention the UK publisher) have no part.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]hefngafr
2008-08-15 02:03 pm UTC (link)
That's a wrinkle I hadn't come across before, but it's certainly part of a pattern. What you notice about all these situations is that they proceed from business decisions, not partly, but exclusively and entirely.

Scribners in the time of Maxwell Perkins, where are you now?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]realthog
2008-08-15 02:41 pm UTC (link)

"they proceed from business decisions, not partly, but exclusively and entirely"

With a further common factor being that they're moronic business decisions.

A couple of the relevant books of mine are selling respectably, and Borders could have had some of that -- just as they could be profiting from the rave reception Greg's Shadowbridge and </i>Lord Tophet</i> are getting.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]anghara
2008-08-15 04:44 pm UTC (link)
He isn't alone. My YA trilogy ("Worldweavers" series, from Harper Collins) is in the same boat. Book one didn't turn out to be harry Potter, so BOrders isn't stocking the rest - they'll special order it but no books in store.

Just so that it won't sell some more, of course.

You have no idea how defeated and discouraged it all makes me feel.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]hefngafr
2008-08-15 05:01 pm UTC (link)
Oh yeah, I think I do. Further up the chain of discouragement, I was unable to sell the third volume of my Holy Ground Trilogy, The Bird Shaman, because sales of Vol. II weren't brisk enough. That book, Time, Like an Ever-Rolling Stream, was a New York Times Notable Book and was shortlisted for the Tiptree, but St. Martin's didn't expect it to do well and it didn't. And those numbers never go away. I finally published Bird myself this year as a POD. There will be a review in the October Locus but no others that I know of; POD is even more the kiss of death than I thought. I think it's my best novel, and so do others. The craziness goes on.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(8 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…